Recursiv vs LangChain

A library you wire into your own infra vs the runtime and backend

How Does Recursiv Compare to LangChain?

LangChain is a library you import to compose chains, agents and tool calls. You still bring your own infrastructure: where it runs, where memory lives, how it deploys and how it is governed. Recursiv is the runtime and the backend. Orchestration, memory, deploy and govern are built, not assembled.

The differentiator is that Recursiv runs the agents. It is not only a set of building blocks you import into an app you operate. The platform schedules work, isolates execution in sandboxes, persists memory, deploys and records what happened, so you can prove what ran.

Quick Comparison

CapabilityRecursivLangChain
TypePlatform and runtimeLibrary
Agent compositionAgents and swarmsChains and agents
Model supportAny model, swap anytimeAny model via integrations
MemoryBrain and memory built inBring your own store
OrchestrationDispatcher and jobsBring your own runtime
Code executionManaged sandboxesBring your own
Where it runsThe platform runs itYour infrastructure
DeployDeployments built inBring your own host
Data and storagePostgres and object storageBring your own
AuthBuilt inBring your own
GovernScoped identity, approvals, audit, self-evalBuild it yourself
IntegrationsHundreds built inMany integrations

When LangChain Is the Better Choice

  • You want a library to drop into an existing app and you already own your infrastructure
  • You need fine-grained control over chain composition and prompt plumbing in your own code
  • You are prototyping locally and do not yet need a managed runtime, memory or govern
  • Your stack is fixed and you want a framework that adapts to it rather than a platform to adopt

Get Started

If you want the orchestration, memory, deploy and govern built rather than assembled, start with the quickstart.